TRM rightly again pointed us in the direction of Acts 15. I paused as I found the words, "...and the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder..." I would like to think that godly men (and women) would divide over meaningful scriptural dispute but it seems that this was not the case. Earlier in the chapter it seems as though they all were unified in NOT keeping the Law in order to be saved, a point at which I as well agree. There was however something so distasteful between Paul and JohnMark that they said(probably old man Paul) in essence, "I can't handle you anymore!" (or words similar to that)(oh yea, that's eisegesis!). Two thousand years later we can only guess what that was, but that is not my emphasis here nor the author of record, Dr Luke. It then hands off to us the lesson of division over issues not important to doctrine. (One of my ick factors would be bad body odor and severe bad breath to which I mutter, "Hey dude, get a little closer to that bar of soap and toothpaste, puhleese!") My point is that we can find anything under the sun to divide over. Let's not do that! However, rest assured that God's plan for the salvation of souls carried on anyway in that the two teams split up and their division served to increase the spread of the Gospel IN SPITE of their (or our) ick factors.
I have seen too many instances of division over petty things in the Assembly- the nursery staffing, the color of the carpet, the PMS of the pastors wife, service times, yada yada waaay too long by pastor, (I hope I am communicating effectively).
I have seen too many instances of division over petty things in the Assembly- the nursery staffing, the color of the carpet, the PMS of the pastors wife, service times, yada yada waaay too long by pastor, (I hope I am communicating effectively).