• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Pope Francis excommicates Paul (Babylon Bee)

1733845801930.png
 
John 5:43
For I have come to you in my Father’s name (YAH), and you have rejected me. Yet if others come in their own name, you gladly welcome them.
 
Frankie Bergoglio is an apostate and an heretic. He makes a mockery of the Throne of Saint Peter.
The "Throne of St. Peter"?
What does that have to do with the bible?
To be clear, Christianity and Catholicism are completely different things.
And the chair, per the Catholic organization is a symbol of their authority. Of which they have none.
 
The "Throne of St. Peter"?
What does that have to do with the bible?
To be clear, Christianity and Catholicism are completely different things.
And the chair, per the Catholic organization is a symbol of their authority. Of which they have none.

I am not a Catholic but I can be respectful of the history of the Catholic church.
 
I am not a Catholic but I can be respectful of the history of the Catholic church.
Some of their so called history, is just stuff they made up! Peter demanded that Cornelius not bow down in reverence to him, which is quite the opposite of what is demanded for the pope.
 
I'm not a German, but I can be respectful of SOME of the history of Germany.

Some parts, not so much...

I agree. Ditto for the Roman Catholic Cult. ;)
 
And the chair, per the Catholic organization is a symbol of their authority. Of which they have none.
Read

"The Hebrew Yeshua Vs. the Greek Jesus: New Light on the Seat of Moses from Shem-Tov's Hebrew Matthew"​

by Nehemiah Gordon, who was a translator on the Dead Sea Scrolls and did an extensive study of the original Hebrew manuscripts (as close as we've got; about 900 AD for Shem Tov's.)

The main point, extensively documented, is that Matthew 23:2 is mis-translated in most English Bibles, and all it takes is a single 'yod' (literally - ' ) to make the difference.

"He" was turned into "they".

What it actually says is:

"Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
All therefore whatsoever they HE [
Moses] bids you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not."

Why does it matter? Moses's seat was real. They did try to sit in it. And Yahushua called the Pharisees out for "adding to" what He had Written.

But those hypocrites were PIKERS compared to the RCC.
 
Read

"The Hebrew Yeshua Vs. the Greek Jesus: New Light on the Seat of Moses from Shem-Tov's Hebrew Matthew"​

by Nehemiah Gordon, who was a translator on the Dead Sea Scrolls and did an extensive study of the original Hebrew manuscripts (as close as we've got; about 900 AD for Shem Tov's.)

The main point, extensively documented, is that Matthew 23:2 is mis-translated in most English Bibles, and all it takes is a single 'yod' (literally - ' ) to make the difference.

"He" was turned into "they".

What it actually says is:

"Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat:
All therefore whatsoever they HE [
Moses] bids you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not."

Why does it matter? Moses's seat was real. They did try to sit in it. And Yahushua called the Pharisees out for "adding to" what He had Written.

But those hypocrites were PIKERS compared to the RCC.
Nehemiah Gordon rejects the New Testament and the Christ it reveals to us. He is not any kind of authority on the New Testament.

And also, Christ and Moses were both delivered to us in Greek. There are no Hebrew versions of either, as you yourself admitted in your post. The Septuagint is how God decided to deliver His Word to us. People recreating the Hebrew have to do so through the Greek. The Hebrew can not be used to change the Greek. The Greek has to be used to check the Hebrew.

And no one who denies Christ can ever be trusted to accurately critique the New Testament.
 
But those hypocrites were PIKERS compared to the RCC.
Amen.

Unbelievable, the stuff they're pulling on the people. What I find fascinating - they still give the people the Holy Scriptures - the truth. The people accept it is the truth and the word of God. Yet, they still reject the Word of God in favor of the RCC. Even though there are examples after examples of people in religion (pharisees) deceiving the great multitude. Then you have Paul's warnings - "Study yourself approved." "Let the Word of God be true, and every man a liar." "Jesus (Yahushua) is the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow." "The law (torah) is Holy, Righteous, and Good." And ofc from the Risen Messiah himself: "It's easier for Heaven and Earth to pass that the smallest iota to drop from the law." Yet they still throw YAH's perfect instructions under the bus - and also his righteous patriarchs - in favor of their own righteousness - which I believe comes from Lucifer (Satan) - the god of this world - deceiving all the nations of the earth.

Pray for them. But if they continue to reject the love of the truth - they have no excuse.

1735554595415.png


Screenshot 2024-12-30 at 5.41.09 AM.png

Screenshot 2024-12-30 at 5.42.17 AM.png
 
Last edited:
There are no Hebrew versions of either, as you yourself admitted in your post. The Septuagint is how God decided to deliver His Word to us.
In the Septuagint - which btw is confirmed in two verses in the NT - the name "Iesous" is for the English name "Joshua." For example, in the Septuagint - the Book of Joshua - is actually called the Book of Iesous. So what is the Hebrew name of Joshua/Iesous? It is - YAHUSHUA. Which means - YAH is Salvation. After all - didn't Jesus (Yahushua) say that he came in his Father's name (YAH), but his people rejected him? YAH is a shortened version of the Heavenly Father's name, which the righteous King David used in the book of Psalms.

Yahushua
Yah is Salvation

HalleluYAH
(Praise YAH)

Screenshot 2024-12-30 at 5.48.04 AM.png
 
Last edited:
You don't bother to read, you don't know what you're talking about, so I don't trust your critique of something you are ignorant of.
I read it. It was just silly. You don’t have the Hebrew. You can’t alter the Greek New Testament based off a Christ denier’s Hebrew translation of the Greek New Testament.

There wasn’t an error in the New Testament for 2,000 years until an unbeliever came around to fix it for us.
 
In the Septuagint - which btw is confirmed in two verses in the NT - the name "Iesous" is for the English name "Joshua." For example, in the Septuagint - the Book of Joshua - is actually called the Book of Iesous. So what is the Hebrew name of Joshua/Iesous? It is - YAHUSHUA. Which means - YAH is Salvation. After all - didn't Jesus (Yahushua) say that he came in his Father's name (YAH), but his people rejected him? YAH is a shortened version of the Heavenly Father's name, which the righteous King David used in the book of Psalms.

Yahushua
Yah is Salvation

HalleluYAH
(Praise YAH)

View attachment 9435
And?
 
Back
Top