Huh? Is this another thing where people are just finding something to be mad about?Complementarianism
No, it’s something that they’ve come up with to make patriarchs mad about.Huh? Is this another thing where people are just finding something to be mad about?

What do you think?
Is it the "equal in status" aspect you are focusing on?View attachment 12155
It has been discussed in a couple of threads on this site, but I’m coming from a slightly different perspective.
Proponents generally teach that the man is the leader, but the minute that they disagree she is still his equal. (He gets to make the final decision once she agrees with him.)
My position is that fairness and equality become an idol that the marriage cannot survive without.
Yes, that would be where it centers.Is it the "equal in status" aspect you are focusing on?
Spiritually, the same sacrifice/price was paid to redeem my soul from eternal condemnation as the soul of anyone else. It cost Jesus Christ everything. Therefore my status before Almighty God is the same as anyone else bought through the sacrifice of the Son.Yes, that would be where it centers.
They actually do have one verse that they have co-opted.By the way, where is verse saying husband and wife have equal status?
Most skilled exegetes will understand that 5:21 is the end of a thought, or series of similar thoughts regarding life skills and order amongst the brethren in righteous living throughout the assembly. It’s meant for the church as a whole, not specific to the home or domestic order.They actually do have one verse that they have co-opted.
Eph. 5:21Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.
Exactly, hence the word “co-opted”.Most skilled exegetes will understand that 5:21 is the end of a thought, or series of similar thoughts regarding life skills and order amongst the brethren in righteous living throughout the assembly. It’s meant for the church as a whole, not specific to the home or domestic order.
5:22 and on gives specific examples of how and where submission works, what it looks like and when it applies. It gives the proper order of submission in everyday life: Wives submit, children submit, servants submit.
5:21 is used as a standalone, universal verse to apply to marriage. It’s not.
How many of these complementarían wives would advocate for their children to get veto rights on the house rules? How do the children complement the moms?Exactly, hence the word “co-opted”.
Great rebuttal, btw.
Couldn't have said it better.Most skilled exegetes will understand that 5:21 is the end of a thought, or series of similar thoughts regarding life skills and order amongst the brethren in righteous living throughout the assembly. It’s meant for the church as a whole, not specific to the home or domestic order.
5:22 and on gives specific examples of how and where submission works, what it looks like and when it applies. It gives the proper order of submission in everyday life: Wives submit, children submit, servants submit.
5:21 is used as a standalone, universal verse to apply to marriage. It’s not.
“Oh, but that’s different.”How many of these complementarían wives would advocate for their children to get veto rights on the house rules? How do the children complement the moms?
I think equality can definitely be an idol, just as anything which goes against the biblical order.What do you think?
The way society is going right now it seems like children DO get veto rights. Parents went out the door along with any form of discipline. Parents need to be their kids best friends. Screens are the babysitters, teachers, and rulers of the house.How many of these complementarían wives would advocate for their children to get veto rights on the house rules? How do the children complement the moms?