NoHmmm don’t know. My guess is the first one?
NoHmmm don’t know. My guess is the first one?
Except who with one with one fish on the hook waits to land it until they have caught another? Someone with all the excitement of a promising relationship/partner doesn't put that relationship on hold while they look for another!I have a theory that the best way to enter polygny would be with two first wives. Marry them at the same time. Then there would never be the idea of exclusivity or first wife rules etc..
Marry twin sisters....I have a theory that the best way to enter polygny would be with two first wives. Marry them at the same time. Then there would never be the idea of exclusivity or first wife rules etc..
I fully agree with your analysis. I believe it is rare. When I was young, I had a cousin dating two ladies at the same time. They all knew this.Except who with one with one fish on the hook waits to land it until they have caught another? Someone with all the excitement of a promising relationship/partner doesn't put that relationship on hold while they look for another!
So....I doubt your theory will be deliberately tested. Joe Darger married two the same day. He had them both interested in him before he pursued getting to know either. II'm retty ssure though that this is not common.
Hello all,
I am in process of meeting a widow for taking her as second.
She adresses the concern that we should meet just us both first.
What do you think and know by experience?
I plan on having alone moments with her, but she is quite far from us so I prefer get there with my FW to be sure they are compatible too.
Am I wrong?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
As a woman who has been there, first meet should be alone. It is VERY intimidating for a married couple to walk up to you with him smiling and her staring at every part of you. If it is a long trip, drop FW off at a shopping mall or somewhere close where she will be safe but not able to stare from around the corner. I assume the FW and prospective partner have already talked and been cordial to each other. But, even with that, it makes you feel like a small child with two people walking up on you like uh hello. Him and her would be more relaxed for a 20 min conversation get a first hug in, see how that chemistry is. If it is a straight no, go pick up FW and head on home. Because honestly, if the man doesn’t have the chemistry with the prospect, who cares if the FW does?? It is the man’s relationship with the wife and the FW has an opinion, but his is the deciding one. The wives getting along is about adjustment and patience. The man and prospect is the main factor and their chemistry and how they get along.Hello all,
I am in process of meeting a widow for taking her as second.
She adresses the concern that we should meet just us both first.
What do you think and know by experience?
I plan on having alone moments with her, but she is quite far from us so I prefer get there with my FW to be sure they are compatible too.
Am I wrong?
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
It certainly would be ideal! LolI have a theory that the best way to enter polygny would be with two first wives. Marry them at the same time. Then there would never be the idea of exclusivity or first wife rules etc..
oh okay. So you secured the relationship by yourself before introducing to your wife. It worked better. I can’t help but think that it must depend on the persons involved. I am trying to discern which is better.
Thank you for your input. I can certainly understand how it can be intimidating.As a woman who has been there, first meet should be alone. It is VERY intimidating for a married couple to walk up to you with him smiling and her staring at every part of you. If it is a long trip, drop FW off at a shopping mall or somewhere close where she will be safe but not able to stare from around the corner. I assume the FW and prospective partner have already talked and been cordial to each other. But, even with that, it makes you feel like a small child with two people walking up on you like uh hello. Him and her would be more relaxed for a 20 min conversation get a first hug in, see how that chemistry is. If it is a straight no, go pick up FW and head on home. Because honestly, if the man doesn’t have the chemistry with the prospect, who cares if the FW does?? It is the man’s relationship with the wife and the FW has an opinion, but his is the deciding one. The wives getting along is about adjustment and patience. The man and prospect is the main factor and their chemistry and how they get along.
I obviously have to SPELL everything.I have just deleted a post which contained very inappropriate advice for someone courting a woman (suggesting you should just sleep with her and if you don't you're clearly not interested). The point of this forum is to actually help people, not wreck their lives. Other mods feel free to act accordingly also.
I get what you’re saying. If there is no prospect for or interest in sex then this is a doomed relationship or at most a cordial friendship. Your advice is to use this first meeting as a way to to try and judge the sexual compatibility of the match as that will give the largest amount of immediate insight into the potential of the relationship.I obviously have to SPELL everything.
What is/are thing(s) which make marriage different from any other type of relationship?
Sex and children. Therefore, any relationship whose purpose are sex/children is marriage by essence. Therefore anyone who on purpose avoids sex/children is person avoiding marriage.
In existing marriage this is breaking existing coventant. No exceptions.
Also, person asking for advice is male which matters in specific way. Since for women biological clock runs way faster than for men, usually failure mode is man taking sweet time for children production. Since in this situation women can't get what she needs on time, she will leave relationship.
If you wonder how normal woman gets to 40s without children this is mechanism. Few serious boyfriends who avoid fertilization.
Also, man-female relationships are simple.
1. Are you for sex?
2. Under which conditions?
Unless you are looking for friend of opposite sex, sex is central topic. Impossible to avoid.
To conclude, to advance male-female relationship it must move toward sex and children. Otherwise, biological imperatives can't be satisfied dooming relationship in advance.
Just because I didn't specify it must be under conditions of marriage, doesn't mean my advice was do it outside of marriage. Hello. It was about what is neccesary for relationship to prosper and how to test is opposite side serious.
In same way, in business setting if there is no chance for money exchange, whole situation is time waster.
Also, widow interest in sex with @NewBeginning will reveal is @NewBeginning widow plan A or plan B. Yes, sometimes women keep in contact with plan B man while trying to get plan A man. Obviously, it sucks to be plan B man whose best option is to break with such woman and spend time on women for whom he is plan A.
Notice I didn't say have sex. Reaction to kissing can speak even louder than reaction to sex because some women perceive kissing as having greater intimacy than sex.
Don't say I have claimed or implied something which doesn't logically follow.
Also, just because I said unconventional and unwelcome TRUTHFULL advice doesn't mean it deserves to be punished by deleting.
We talked about sex and children,I obviously have to SPELL everything.
What is/are thing(s) which make marriage different from any other type of relationship?
Sex and children. Therefore, any relationship whose purpose are sex/children is marriage by essence. Therefore anyone who on purpose avoids sex/children is person avoiding marriage.
In existing marriage this is breaking existing coventant. No exceptions.
Also, person asking for advice is male which matters in specific way. Since for women biological clock runs way faster than for men, usually failure mode is man taking sweet time for children production. Since in this situation women can't get what she needs on time, she will leave relationship.
If you wonder how normal woman gets to 40s without children this is mechanism. Few serious boyfriends who avoid fertilization.
Also, man-female relationships are simple.
1. Are you for sex?
2. Under which conditions?
Unless you are looking for friend of opposite sex, sex is central topic. Impossible to avoid.
To conclude, to advance male-female relationship it must move toward sex and children. Otherwise, biological imperatives can't be satisfied dooming relationship in advance.
Just because I didn't specify it must be under conditions of marriage, doesn't mean my advice was do it outside of marriage. Hello. It was about what is neccesary for relationship to prosper and how to test is opposite side serious.
In same way, in business setting if there is no chance for money exchange, whole situation is time waster.
Also, widow interest in sex with @NewBeginning will reveal is @NewBeginning widow plan A or plan B. Yes, sometimes women keep in contact with plan B man while trying to get plan A man. Obviously, it sucks to be plan B man whose best option is to break with such woman and spend time on women for whom he is plan A.
Notice I didn't say have sex. Reaction to kissing can speak even louder than reaction to sex because some women perceive kissing as having greater intimacy than sex.
Don't say I have claimed or implied something which doesn't logically follow.
Also, just because I said unconventional and unwelcome TRUTHFULL advice doesn't mean it deserves to be punished by deleting.
It absolutely depends on the actual person.I can’t help but think that it must depend on the persons involved. I am trying to discern which is better.
If there is no prospect for or interest in sex then this is a doomed relationship or at most a cordial friendship.
And this is why you are the BibFam centerfold playmate of all time. You’re our Bettie Page.I adhere to the rule that if you move into his house then the prospect for sex is a given and it's up to him. Or else don't move in.
Good pointIt sounds like your family isn't that much into Scripture. I say this because you cannot use the Bible to justify the Bible to people who do not believe in the Bible.
It's more effective to find real world examples of people who live Biblical principles to assert your position and then lead your family to the source of those principles.
I say that from experience. Being made to live Biblical principles helped me to come to Christ
It’s not that simple you need a Bill of Divorcement from him.I have been wanting to address this but haven’t had the right frame of mind to do it. It seems I have missed my opportunity, if you want to call it that, to be a second wife and it has been eating me up.
We all got along and my kids loved them both. But, they are teens in high school and it all fell apart when I refused to uproot them in his Jr and her Freshman year and move 45 mins to the home. My kids are very active in school and have to be there at 5:30am and sometimes until 7pm. We currently live 2 miles from the school verses the 40miles to the home. I begged to wait on moving, remodeling the home; which would be a chore since two rooms would need to be added. But alas, it crumbled because I wasn’t willing to move my kids to a school that doesn’t offer what they are already set up in for their future paths.
My question is, should I give up? I have prayed for Yah to break the soul tie with this man, but it is still strong in me that a future could happen after my kids move out in two years. Should I ask for the time and plead my case yet again or move on?
Advice and prayers appreciated for this burden of my heart and spirit.
Nope they don’t ever care.Keep in mind the divorce courts don't care.
This is the worst advice I have ever read. Building a marriage off of a sexual relationship or lack thereof is an absolute dumpster fire waiting to happen. Sex can’t be the end all be all of a relationship, there are more things marriage is predicated on than sex. At most if you having sex everyday Thats maybe an hour tops what are you doing the other 23 hrs of your day?I obviously have to SPELL everything.
What is/are thing(s) which make marriage different from any other type of relationship?
Sex and children. Therefore, any relationship whose purpose are sex/children is marriage by essence. Therefore anyone who on purpose avoids sex/children is person avoiding marriage.
In existing marriage this is breaking existing coventant. No exceptions.
Also, person asking for advice is male which matters in specific way. Since for women biological clock runs way faster than for men, usually failure mode is man taking sweet time for children production. Since in this situation women can't get what she needs on time, she will leave relationship.
If you wonder how normal woman gets to 40s without children this is mechanism. Few serious boyfriends who avoid fertilization.
Also, man-female relationships are simple.
1. Are you for sex?
2. Under which conditions?
Unless you are looking for friend of opposite sex, sex is central topic. Impossible to avoid.
To conclude, to advance male-female relationship it must move toward sex and children. Otherwise, biological imperatives can't be satisfied dooming relationship in advance.
Just because I didn't specify it must be under conditions of marriage, doesn't mean my advice was do it outside of marriage. Hello. It was about what is neccesary for relationship to prosper and how to test is opposite side serious.
In same way, in business setting if there is no chance for money exchange, whole situation is time waster.
Also, widow interest in sex with @NewBeginning will reveal is @NewBeginning widow plan A or plan B. Yes, sometimes women keep in contact with plan B man while trying to get plan A man. Obviously, it sucks to be plan B man whose best option is to break with such woman and spend time on women for whom he is plan A.
Notice I didn't say have sex. Reaction to kissing can speak even louder than reaction to sex because some women perceive kissing as having greater intimacy than sex.
Don't say I have claimed or implied something which doesn't logically follow.
Also, just because I said unconventional and unwelcome TRUTHFULL advice doesn't mean it deserves to be punished by deleting.
Thank you for sharing.First wife went with me to meet second wife in person. She lived nearby so we both drove to her house and met her. We then went out on a group date. I also had individual dates with her. With third wife, we also all met her in person. She lived a long ways away and flew in to meet us. I believe all of us, myself, FW, 2ndW, went to pick her up and we all spent time together that evening. Next day FW and 3W went out for girls time shopping, if I remember correctly.
So to answer question in each case we all met, not just me. I had individual dates, but not upon the first meeting. Of course all of this was after communicating online for a period of time, in which all of us communicated, not just me and the potential wife.