Given what is coming?
I think I have been explicit about my bespoke tinfoil hat notions are which will significantly effect climate, have you? If not then fill me in.
-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
I think I have been explicit about my bespoke tinfoil hat notions are which will significantly effect climate, have you? If not then fill me in.
I talk frequently about AGWBS (Anthropogenic Global Warming BS) in a number of forums, including here, but also news and "Come out of her, My people" shows. Geoengineering is a big deal, and much further along than most are aware, and significantly more evil.
But the solar cycle, according to both cycles experts (books like "Cold Sun," and "Dark Winter," by John Casey) and a number of prominent Russian solar scientists, indicate we are headed toward a Maunder Minimum, rather than warming. (About which the data has famously been 'fudged' anyway; see East Anglia scandal in the UK, among others.)
So, I look for cooling. And the geoengineering will only make that worse. As will vulcanism which should likely correspond with the coming solar minimum.
And there's plenty more, befitting the 'conspiracy' arena as well, since all are being soft-pedaled, at best:
Nemesis. AKA, "Planet X," Wormwood, Nibiru, and Velikovsky. Real? Who knows. But you can't trust 'em anyway.
Pole shift, certainly magnetic, perhaps more, "soon..."
Energy infrastructure. Already under attack, and destroyed in much of Europe.
Etc.
PS> Nukes would do it, too.
I was on board the Maunder Minimum train for a while as the math works.
I see the geomagnetic excursion as a bigger issue however
The Hydroplate Theory offers a good explanation for pole shifting. It posits that earth's axis changed due to the mountain ranges that were formed.
There are lots of names for similar.
Bear in mind that it is important to distinguish between a regular magnetic pole shift, and a (more serious w.r.t. earthquakes, etc) rotational shift.
One of the 'confounding issues' is that several of these events are correlated. (The sun, for example, can affect most of 'em. Posited things like gravity waves and cosmic radiation potentially as well, and may affect the sun to boot.)
Gravity waves eh! People who posit that sort of thing, I get the impression they don't know what they are talking about.
I didn't 'posit' anything. But - it is called "science."
Evolution has no patience with it.
But physics is known for 'positing' all kinds of things - from quanta and the ether to relativity - and many get rejected, or accepted, and sometimes - rejected, and then accepted, even more than once. (aka 'aether' et al.)
PS> I could list a dozen more, just off the top of my head - from string theory to 'the multiverse' to ZPE - all of which are more "out there" than any kind of wave. Or particle that LOOKS like a wave - maybe...
Evolution has no patience with it.
But physics is known for 'positing' all kinds of things - from quanta and the ether to relativity - and many get rejected, or accepted, and sometimes - rejected, and then accepted, even more than once. (aka 'aether' et al.)
PS> I could list a dozen more, just off the top of my head - from string theory to 'the multiverse' to ZPE - all of which are more "out there" than any kind of wave. Or particle that LOOKS like a wave - maybe...
Last edited:
Well, as I have posted elsewhere ZPE perfectly explains gravity. It may seem out there, but ZPE explains a lot of things that we observe in the physical universe. I find it preposterous when I see these shows that supposedly explain how the universe works, by showing some sort of grid that is supposedly space being warped by gravity. The graphic makes no sense whatsoever! It always shows some sort of plane that bends around the sphere, but it is still a two dimensional plane, and for some odd reason, that grid doesn't form a sphere itself. It just extends out into some arbitrary plane.I didn't 'posit' anything. But - it is called "science."
Evolution has no patience with it.
But physics is known for 'positing' all kinds of things - from quanta and the ether to relativity - and many get rejected, or accepted, and sometimes - rejected, and then accepted, even more than once. (aka 'aether' et al.)
PS> I could list a dozen more, just off the top of my head - from string theory to 'the multiverse' to ZPE - all of which are more "out there" than any kind of wave. Or particle that LOOKS like a wave - maybe...
Do you have or know anyone who has an appreciable piece of land for hunting?
Do you have or know anyone who has an appreciable piece of land for hunting?
Unfortunately not.
The only person I know with that sort of access is a ranch manager/hunt guide that works for a local billionaire who has a game ranch southeast of the metroplex.
I get regular invitations for whenever the boss is not around but annoyingly life always gets in the way.
Really making an effort this year for myself and family to prep this year and go. Down to six brisket, two bellies and a couple of full pork loins to get through as well as a little miscellania in the largest chest freezer.
My son is old enough to watch dad butcher a deer and learn to help make sausage etc...so time to get off my ass and start putting some large quantities of venison in the boy.
I will start asking around though. Presumably you are thinking deer. What about hogs, any interest there?
This is because people with small minds can't wrap their heads around three dimensional visualizations. So you give them something they can comprehend and at least understand part of the point you're trying to get across.
I have the same issues with the small minds who take everything in the Bible literally while not allowing for the fact that metaphors are a thing and that some of the metaphors of the Biblical period are lost to time.
The idiots who stick their fingers in their ears and go "LALALALALALA!! I CAN'T HEAR YOU!!" when I talk about this also fail to understand that the Parables were perfect examples of Biblical metaphors whose original meanings sometimes need to be studied in depth before we can truly understand them.
The Parable of the Good Samaritan being a perfect example of what I mean.
Now try to explain to some doofus who believes that Samaritans were nice people that gravity is an actual thing that we do not understand.
Good luck with that.
Well I had this conversation with a Catholic who was convinced that the bread and the wine become the literal body and blood of Jesus, that in fact there are metaphors, and there are literal claims, and it takes a lot of in depth study of the Scriptures, to discenr between the two. Gravity is not really a thing; it is and effect. I don't think even the greatest mind can truly wrap their heads around what they think they are explaining, when it comes to this whole "curvature of space" nonsense. Where is the edge of this curvature? It seems to me that if it were really curved, there wouldn't be an entry or exit point. This is just an absurd concept that I don't believe its proponents really thought it through to its inevitable conclusion.
EDIT: For further discussion, we can go to the Einstein thread.
Last edited:
I am thinking deer. Not hogs.
I appreciate you asking around
